<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seagate BlackArmor 440 in Active Directory a losing battle?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.computereverything.net/2009/06/16/seagate-blackarmor-440-in-active-directory-a-losing-battle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.computereverything.net/2009/06/16/seagate-blackarmor-440-in-active-directory-a-losing-battle/</link>
	<description>[Repair - PC's - Networking - Server  Support - Web Design and more]</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 10:22:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.computereverything.net/2009/06/16/seagate-blackarmor-440-in-active-directory-a-losing-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computereverything.net/?p=197#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Robert thanks for your post,  sorry you&#039;ve had the same frustrations.  

As a follow up I&#039;ve tested the Western Digital ShareSpace 4 TB ( WDA4NC40000 ) and have gotten it working well.  The box came shipped very similar to the Seagate BlackArmor (Raid 5, HTTP/HTTPS access, Linux OS, almost identical web interface) but guess what?  The Active Directory integration worked flawlessly out of the box.  My only complaint is that it&#039;s tedious to administer for so many users.  An example of my setup is:

NAS\User1share$
AD_DOMAIN\User1
AD_DOMAIN\NASAdmin

NAS\User2share$
AD_DOMAIN\User2
AD_DOMAIN\NASAdmin

NAS\User3share$
AD_DOMAIN\User3
AD_DOMAIN\NASAdmin

NAS\User4share$
AD_DOMAIN\User4
AD_DOMAIN\NASAdmin

NAS\User5share$
AD_DOMAIN\User5
AD_DOMAIN\NASAdmin

Each user has their own personal share which a privileged account can also access for administration purposes.  Domain login script assigns each user a network drive letter to their personal space.  Users can archive emails via PST files to this share and also dump large picture collections, etc.  I have yet to setup quotas on the shares but considering restricting each user to 5GB each.  I also will be setting up a Backup-to-Disk folder for Symantec Backup Exec to add redundancy to our nightly backup procedure.

Robert have you explored any additional Network Storage solutions?  My next step would be to evaluate a QNAP TS series but I think we will do well with this WD for the price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert thanks for your post,  sorry you&#8217;ve had the same frustrations.  </p>
<p>As a follow up I&#8217;ve tested the Western Digital ShareSpace 4 TB ( WDA4NC40000 ) and have gotten it working well.  The box came shipped very similar to the Seagate BlackArmor (Raid 5, HTTP/HTTPS access, Linux OS, almost identical web interface) but guess what?  The Active Directory integration worked flawlessly out of the box.  My only complaint is that it&#8217;s tedious to administer for so many users.  An example of my setup is:</p>
<p>NAS\User1share$<br />
AD_DOMAIN\User1<br />
AD_DOMAIN\NASAdmin</p>
<p>NAS\User2share$<br />
AD_DOMAIN\User2<br />
AD_DOMAIN\NASAdmin</p>
<p>NAS\User3share$<br />
AD_DOMAIN\User3<br />
AD_DOMAIN\NASAdmin</p>
<p>NAS\User4share$<br />
AD_DOMAIN\User4<br />
AD_DOMAIN\NASAdmin</p>
<p>NAS\User5share$<br />
AD_DOMAIN\User5<br />
AD_DOMAIN\NASAdmin</p>
<p>Each user has their own personal share which a privileged account can also access for administration purposes.  Domain login script assigns each user a network drive letter to their personal space.  Users can archive emails via PST files to this share and also dump large picture collections, etc.  I have yet to setup quotas on the shares but considering restricting each user to 5GB each.  I also will be setting up a Backup-to-Disk folder for Symantec Backup Exec to add redundancy to our nightly backup procedure.</p>
<p>Robert have you explored any additional Network Storage solutions?  My next step would be to evaluate a QNAP TS series but I think we will do well with this WD for the price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Malton</title>
		<link>http://www.computereverything.net/2009/06/16/seagate-blackarmor-440-in-active-directory-a-losing-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Malton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computereverything.net/?p=197#comment-71</guid>
		<description>I ran into the exact same problem and there is no solution from seagate coming. Once I had my share created I wanted sub folders for each of my sections could have a public and private folder, however with this device it all or none, you can&#039;t give file level permission.  I should have set up a regular file server, you go cheap you get cheap.  

However, for a home user I think this would be a good solution, for business large or small this is not for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ran into the exact same problem and there is no solution from seagate coming. Once I had my share created I wanted sub folders for each of my sections could have a public and private folder, however with this device it all or none, you can&#8217;t give file level permission.  I should have set up a regular file server, you go cheap you get cheap.  </p>
<p>However, for a home user I think this would be a good solution, for business large or small this is not for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
